-
Board index
-
- It is currently Sat Oct 24, 2026 11:28 am
- All times are UTC
This is where we discuss general Asian Archery topics. Try to use specific topic fora if possilble.
-
jack farrell
- Posts: 1864
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:40 am
- Location: Texas
Post
by jack farrell » Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:45 am
My friend went here, wants me to post these pictures, does not want his name posted. Hope you enjoy.
-
jack farrell
- Posts: 1864
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:40 am
- Location: Texas
Post
by jack farrell » Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:47 am
These flint objects are like others I have seen from Africa to Central Asia.
-
jack farrell
- Posts: 1864
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:40 am
- Location: Texas
Post
by jack farrell » Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:51 am
Same with these bronze age points. They are cast and then hammer finished. The cross section of these is a thin diamond shape. They usually lack a strong central ridge at this date. These look like others from a very large area. Provenience is very important.
-
jack farrell
- Posts: 1864
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:40 am
- Location: Texas
Post
by jack farrell » Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:54 am
Although there is some overlapping to type dating, generally speaking, Iron Age points, which are still made of bronze, have more material in them and have a well defined center ridge.
-
jack farrell
- Posts: 1864
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:40 am
- Location: Texas
Post
by jack farrell » Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:58 am
This is some ethnographic material. Obviously much is missing. The bow with the cowrie shell decorations is identical to one I have seen collected in Chad. I am unfamiliar with the importance of the shells except that they used to be traded as money in Africa.
-
Zarasp
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:11 pm
- Location: Iran Tehran
Post
by Zarasp » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:31 am
Very Interesting!
I didnt know the difference in central ridge & the weight difference until now,
thanx for sharing!