BARE THUMB SHOOTING
- Orda Khan
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:45 am
- Location: Wales
-
ravenbows
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:51 am
- Location: USA
Mr. SelbyStephen Selby wrote:I shoot bare thumb. If there were any nerves in my thumb before, they're long gone now. But I never shoot with a heavy bow. 40-45# is sufficient for all my needs.
How long are you shooting sessions? Approximately how many arrows would you shoot during a average session?
I really feel that if the thumb is built up that one can be or in tune with the bow and the arrow, and because of this would allow an opportunity better accuracy and quicker reload.
To go from one to the other in my limited experience is an adjustment, and it seems to me that the ancients especially during battle would not want to make that adjustment during a war.
Given the time and the energy it would require to make a thumb ring using ancient tools, it seems so practical that the soldiers would indeed be accustom to shooting bare thumb or leather coverings.
I just don't know if the bare thumb allows for long shooting sessions.
-
Hermitking
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:16 am
- Location: Nenana, Alaska
I bare thumb shot in the early years but the heavy pull of the string and tight string angle always pumped the tip of my thumb with blood, making my thumb easy to chaff and cut. No matter how much callous I would still get cut up. Sometimes I would even have the callous rip right off.
I advise using at the very least a thick hard leather gaurd, and advise using a thumb ring. Thumb rings can be made very easy and materials are common. Light weight bows and short shooting sessions may make bare thumbing possible, but for me short shooting sessions are not enough to satisfy the archery impulse.
I advise using at the very least a thick hard leather gaurd, and advise using a thumb ring. Thumb rings can be made very easy and materials are common. Light weight bows and short shooting sessions may make bare thumbing possible, but for me short shooting sessions are not enough to satisfy the archery impulse.
-
ravenbows
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:51 am
- Location: USA
That is pretty much the common sense approach that I was looking for. I do shoot about 100 arrows a day, and a little tape works well but a ring works better.Hermitking wrote:Thumb rings can be made very easy and materials are common. Light weight bows and short shooting sessions may make bare thumbing possible, but for me short shooting sessions are not enough to satisfy the archery impulse.
I was looking for any long term effects of shooting bare thumb with a heavier bow and I believe that you pretty much summed it up there.
-
Hermitking
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:16 am
- Location: Nenana, Alaska
In the early years I really hated having extra, "stuff," to carry around. I wanted the simplicity of nothing but bow and arrows. A thumb ring was just another thing to make, break or loose. I also wanted to be independant from aids in shooting, sort of a grab your bow and arrows and go shoot... like the minutemen of the American revolution.
But after awhile it sort of sunk in that the thumb ring was not that much of a burden, and frankly it makes a good status symbol. I sometimes use the wrist thong of my thumbring to hang the thumb ring around my neck to show off in public display. I also started using a thumb glove for the bow gripping hand, for I use the thumb as the shooting shelf. It was easy to make a leather thumb sock and kind of looked nice.
In Iowa I had to buy horn to make rings, not having heard of the pool ball idea. Now I have an abundant source of ring material in Moose antler. The base where it attaches to the skull is almost solid all the way through for several inches and can yeild about 3-4 good solid rings. A large deer antler base can give one or two probably, and is pretty common.
But after awhile it sort of sunk in that the thumb ring was not that much of a burden, and frankly it makes a good status symbol. I sometimes use the wrist thong of my thumbring to hang the thumb ring around my neck to show off in public display. I also started using a thumb glove for the bow gripping hand, for I use the thumb as the shooting shelf. It was easy to make a leather thumb sock and kind of looked nice.
In Iowa I had to buy horn to make rings, not having heard of the pool ball idea. Now I have an abundant source of ring material in Moose antler. The base where it attaches to the skull is almost solid all the way through for several inches and can yeild about 3-4 good solid rings. A large deer antler base can give one or two probably, and is pretty common.
- Stephen Selby
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:10 pm
- Location: Hong Kong
- Contact:
I shoot until my thumb gets sore.ravenbows wrote: Mr. Selby
How long are you shooting sessions? Approximately how many arrows would you shoot during a average session?
Normally I'm fine shooting until my muscles start to protest, which is around 30 arrows, Then a 15 minute rest and a cup of tea sets me right for some more. My thumb is never the first thing to give out.
With horseback archery, what with all that goes on, you don't get to spend so much time pulling the bow, so the problem doesn't arise.
- Szabi Nagy
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:22 am
- Location: Balatonalmadi, Hungary
- Bede
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:57 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Szabi,
You are right that the absence of evidence has less validity than its presence. However, when you add together eye witness accounts, artistic representations and the absence of evidence then I think that absence has more impact than if it was used by itself.
The Magyar invasion of Pannonia was comprised of several tribes, some of whom had contacts with Khwarezm (Choresmia in some sources). It is possible that some people used thumb rings, but usually you have to prove something that has no evidence by finding something to support it. If someone finds a burial with a thumb ring from the Invasion Period, I would not be surprised, but I am not counting on it happening.
Much discussion of archery equipment was started in the nineteenth century when neither the archaeological discoveries we have today were available nor knowledge of the spread of technologies. Some of this entered the historical dialogues of the time as if it were fact instead of conjecture. Many historians were interested in the "big picture" and were not too worried about details. We in our times look back for source material and innocently assume that earlier historians had the same standards of evidence we are used to.
You are right that the absence of evidence has less validity than its presence. However, when you add together eye witness accounts, artistic representations and the absence of evidence then I think that absence has more impact than if it was used by itself.
The Magyar invasion of Pannonia was comprised of several tribes, some of whom had contacts with Khwarezm (Choresmia in some sources). It is possible that some people used thumb rings, but usually you have to prove something that has no evidence by finding something to support it. If someone finds a burial with a thumb ring from the Invasion Period, I would not be surprised, but I am not counting on it happening.
Much discussion of archery equipment was started in the nineteenth century when neither the archaeological discoveries we have today were available nor knowledge of the spread of technologies. Some of this entered the historical dialogues of the time as if it were fact instead of conjecture. Many historians were interested in the "big picture" and were not too worried about details. We in our times look back for source material and innocently assume that earlier historians had the same standards of evidence we are used to.
Bede
- Szabi Nagy
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:22 am
- Location: Balatonalmadi, Hungary
Bede, I completely agree with you, just playing the Devil's advocate a bit. My concern is the 400-500-year-long gap between the arrival of the magyars to the Carpathian basin and the eye witness and artistic records. We know that very big changes happened during this period (religion, way of life, warfare, weapons, etc). Just wondering about Sahname, my copy shows nice illustrations about thumb draw while we know that the Sassanids used a different technique (I wrote about that some time ago and we discussed, but maybe it's good to bring it back again).
Szabi
Szabi
- Bede
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:57 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
When Firdousi wrote the Shahnameh, everyone in Iran was using the thumb draw. Artists who illustrated copies usually painted the things they saw around them rather than tried to recreate the past. In some areas they followed the text. For instance, Rustam nearly always has his tiger skin coat and Feridun's mace is usually in the bull's head form. However, in a Safavid painting, the Iranians will be wearing the taj, the red Safavi cap with a tall baton on the crown, under their turbans no matter what part of the book is being illustrated. No one thought about the fact that neither Shapur or Khusrau would have ever seen that type of head dress. Everyone is using stirrups too despite the fact the Sasanids did not use them.
The paintings are historical documents for their own time, not the time of the story they are illustrating. Even in archery literature, the Sasanian release had been forgotten and various types of the thumb draw were attributed to people like Bahram Gur. The famous silver plates, which we base our theory of Sasanian draw upon, were still buried in tombs at the time mediaeval books on archery were written.
The paintings are historical documents for their own time, not the time of the story they are illustrating. Even in archery literature, the Sasanian release had been forgotten and various types of the thumb draw were attributed to people like Bahram Gur. The famous silver plates, which we base our theory of Sasanian draw upon, were still buried in tombs at the time mediaeval books on archery were written.
Bede
