Extreme string follow

This is where we discuss the bows, arrows, quivers and other hardware used in Asian archery.
Post Reply
Daniel
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: Poland/Ireland

Extreme string follow

Post by Daniel » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:10 pm

Looking at the old Turkish bows from Dresden Museum collection we can see many bows with an extreme string follow. I wonder what would be the main cause of this? It's hard to imagine that those bows would have acquired such a great set only by being strung for long time and not being subjected to some serious misscariage in the past.
User avatar
Kviljo
Posts: 759
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 8:35 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Kviljo » Sun Feb 27, 2011 8:59 pm

I think it is quite normal to explain it by prolonged time of being strung. 20-30 years of having been strung in different temperatures ought to do something with even the best bows.
User avatar
Bede
Posts: 2360
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:57 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Bede » Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:27 am

I have seen pictures of the same bows showing they were strung at least 60 years and perhaps more in the many years they were on display in the Elector's collection. It was not unusual to display strung bows since few curators knew anything about archery in the 18th and 19th centuries. Those bows that were not strung often lost their strings so we can be thankful for small mercies.
Bede
User avatar
Kviljo
Posts: 759
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 8:35 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Kviljo » Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:26 pm

I've been wondering if the permanent shape such bows have taken reflect exactly the original shape of the bow, or if the bends get more concentrated over the years. Ie. would the most stressed section of the bow at brace gather more bend than the less stressed sections over years of having been strung, and therefore showing more concentrated bends in the limbs?
Daniel
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: Poland/Ireland

Post by Daniel » Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:33 pm

Adam talks about that in the book. He states that creep is the major factor. Is that reversible?
Adam Karpowicz
Posts: 753
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:57 am
Location: Canada

Post by Adam Karpowicz » Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:04 pm

Yes, more stress over time = more creep in the materials. The permanent strung shape reflects the stresses in the strung position. Not much different than the stresses in the drawn bow (there will be more stress closer to the grip in the drawn bow).

I suppose, one could gently warm the limbs and gradually bring them back to reflex, then leave there for a few years, perhaps at an elevated temperature. Still, the reversal will not likely be complete and the bow will remain weaker. This is of course irrelevant, since the old bows belong in the museum and must not be tampered with. Actually, the strung shape will be helpful for the visitors to imagine the bow in use.

Adam
User avatar
JJ
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:38 am
Location: Germany

Post by JJ » Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:15 am

Adam,

another solution found and used extensively by clever Museum staff was to string the bows backwards ;-)

JJ
Post Reply