Treatise in Turkish bows

This is where we can exchange information on literary and artistic resources related to Asian traditional archery
Post Reply
Outlaw
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: Belgium

Treatise in Turkish bows

Post by Outlaw » Sat Nov 27, 2010 8:07 pm

User avatar
Bede
Posts: 2360
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:57 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Bede » Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:43 am

This is Payne-Gallwey's outdated and inaccurate treatise. It was important in its time, but even then it was criticised by Ingo Simon, specifically the manner of using the thumb ring. More recently, there have been several serious comments on his identification of neck tendon as the source of sinew on the backs of Turkish bows.
Bede
Ashbow
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:17 pm
Location: Poland

Post by Ashbow » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:02 pm

I've been wondering for a long time if Mr. Payne did really shoot with the thumbring the way he claimed it to be the only correct, he wrote he did, but it's quite hard to believe so.
User avatar
Bede
Posts: 2360
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:57 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Bede » Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:44 pm

You could look at what Payne-Gallwey was doing as turning an ordinary thumb ring into a Korean male ring. It would certainly have been uncomfortable and would have damaged the string.

I have seen some correspondence suggesting that Ingo Simon, who knew Sir Ralph personally, wasn't sure that he maintained this technique throughout his life. Payne-Gallwey did shoot some powerful Turkish bows. It is hard to believe that he would have shot bows in that uncomfortable manner, but people do strange things.
Bede
Post Reply